I think the assumption for this debate should be that both the pterodactyl and the bear could fire at will without worrying about pulling triggers and whatnot. Then it comes down to whether or not the bear could accurately fire straight upward before he gets his ass sliced up. And remember the bear can't shoot and run/dodge at the same time since the guns are on his feet. I say the pterodactyl wins 64.25781% of the time.
Well the bear wont be able to reload (assuming they're already live) and he can't squeeze the trigger or aim into the sky. My god, we might have a debate on our hands, gentleman. :O
Wow , this is as confusing as the battle taste great less filling. Thinking the bear wins , triggers would be controlled like his regular hands so there is no way the damn dinosaur could get close enough to shit accurately on the bear.
That really is a tough one...at first I was thinking the pterodactyl but if they both start from the same plane, the bear could definitely shoot the ptero before it gets above the bear to poop the chainsaw on it. Gosh.
....(continued from below) tools of trade. also its assumed you are clever enough to realize the complete possibility of this event given the amazing advancements in genetics, robotics, park forest monitoring, and jurassic park technology. and lastly....no way that fraggin bear is out maneuvering the saw pooper. what? hey frack you dino humper! bear's gonna clip those lame wings into swiss cheese. Woman! get off my computer with your nonsense. wank you and your little pecker dude. Ptero! Bear!
look you vile wastes of commentators to the world's foremost prominent philosophical and strategical debate.....my girlfriend's friend was the creator of this question. she brought it to me. and together we recognized its relevance and took it to the world. we figured the world would be smart enough to make the obvious assumptions here but since we were wrong and you're retarded allow me to clear some shit up. its assumed they both have unlimited ammo and they are both proficient with their too
look you vile wastes of commentators to the world's foremost prominent philosophical and strategical debate.....my girlfriend's friend was the creator of this question. she brought it to me. and together we recognized its relevance and took it to the world. we figured the world would be smart enough to make the obvious assumptions here but since we were wrong and you're retarded allow me to clear some shit up. its assumed they both have unlimited ammo and they are both proficient with their...
retarded. How would a pterodactyl carry a chainsaw or even start the chainsaw? Impossible for him to win. Meanwhile, how would the bear put bullets in the machine gun? If the gun came loaded, then the bear could possibly lay on his back by a tree and use sticks as a lever against the trigger guard to keep the trigger pulled and just point his feet up. The pterodactyl could never get close yet the bear's steady stream of upward bullets would get him if he tried. It's either bear wins or neither wins
Comments
You must be Logged in to post a comment