I cannot understand how this turned into a 28 comment diatribe. clearly it was experimenting, which we all agree is completely ok and don't determine sexual orientation
Points for using diatribe...but the experimenting thing is widely accepted as NOT ok between guys. Double standard, okay I'll give you that; however, I have to side with the "That's fucked up" side of the argument this time.
One blowjob. Giving or receiving. Spit or swallow? Haha. Giving at all kinda does. Swallowing, absolutely. Spitting, maybe not. Receiving, less so. Hell, a bj is a bj. Lol. And some say that guys give better head anyway purely because guys know what guys like! Lol
That's rather similar to what my ex-boyfriend said. Take a guess as to why he's now my ex-boyfriend rather than my boyfriend... :/\n\nBe wary of men in denial, ladies.
At first I thought this was a guy, saying that getting one blow job from a guy doesn't mean he's not straight, but reading it over I think it makes more sense that it was a chick, trying to say that giving one guy a blow job "doesn't not" make her a lesbian.
normally I would agree, but I think if they were drunk enough to make the mistake of a double negative, they wouldn't be able to use a double negative to express what they wanted to say to begin with. Plus 'she' would've said 'doesn't make me not g@y' instead... wait... why are we arguing about the possible meanings of someone's drunk ramblings like it's a prophesy?
Submitted by
nightlithium
on Nov 22, 10 at 11:13pm
Because nobody knows what the hell a prophesy is...prophecy on the other hand...ok I'm just busting you balls/tits with the grammar nazi thing, I actually agree.
I feel like if this was a girl she would use the L word as opposed to the G word. Sidenote: what the hell is with this sites terms of service? As a homo, I think I should have the right to use whatever terms I want to label my demographic.
Anyone arguing that sender is a girl is an idiot. Ask yourself what the most logical answer is: someone's texting in double negatives OR it's a simple typo with a superfluous N tacked onto the word does. Obviously sender is a guy. Of course, if sender is a girl then all you guys don't have to worry about your own experimenting meaning you not aren't not straight....
Makes sense to me. In the text the person says "doesn not." The n could be a mistake or they could have meant to say "doesn't." If they meant "doesn't," it could easily be a girl.
Submitted by
Figuratively
on Nov 21, 10 at 10:07am
Makes sense to me. In the text, the person says "doesn not." The extra n could be a mistake, or the person could have been trying to say, "doesn't not." If that is the case, it could easily have been a girl.
Submitted by
Figuratively
on Nov 21, 10 at 10:13am
Okay, fuck that extra "n", I think it is safe to say their mind was thinking, "doesn't" but their fingers typed "doesn not." I feel this is a dude, and either way...slight homo or at the very least bi-curious. "Not that there's anything wrong with it."
Figuratively speaking.... Haha a pun figuratively does not have a high school english because talking in the double negative is wrong thus concluding that it was a dude and you are wrong
You can drive a truck your whole life and the old truck drivers won't call you a truck driver, but suck one little dick and you're a dick sucker forever! Fired.
could've just been a typo though... i do that all the time, drunk and not lol hit the 'n' too soon... and t9 would've probably fixed the second word, so then there'd be two 'n's haha\n\nconfusing...
Comments
You must be Logged in to post a comment